‘Serious conservation concern’ leads to decreased harvest for Bluenose-East caribou

Joseph Judas is the chair of the Wek’èezhìı Renewable Resources Board. The board hosted a public hearing for the Bluenose-East caribou herd in April. (Francis Tessier-Burns/CKLB).

Updated: June 19, 10:30 a.m. to reflect additional comments from ENR on Bathurst report delay

According to Indigenous and scientific evidence “a serious conservation concern exists for the Sahtì ekwǫ̀ (Bluenose-East) caribou.”

This is one of the conclusions outlined in the Wek’èezhìı Renewable Resources Board’s ruling on the herd’s joint management plan submitted by the Tłı̨chǫ Government and Department of Environment and Natural Resources.

According to the latest population survey done by ENR, between 2015 and 2018, the population of Sahtì ekwǫ̀ caribou dropped by about 50 per cent, down to 19,000 animals. The average cow survival rate between 2010 and 2018 was 79 per cent; a stable herd has a cow survival rate between 84 and 92 per cent.

The plan originally proposed dropping the total allowable harvest for the herd from 750 to 300 bulls. The board decided that wasn’t low enough and ruled that only 193 bulls a year will be harvested within the Wek’èezhìı boundary for the 2019/2020 and 2020/2021 seasons.

Of those 193 bulls, 76 of them will be going to Tłı̨chǫ citizens and 117 will be going to “Indigenous people who traditionally harvest Sahtì ekwǫ̀.”

To offset the reduced harvest, the WRRB recommends that Tłı̨chǫ citizens harvest “alternative country foods.”

Predator management and habitat protection

 A large part of the proposed management plan was upping the price for wolf pelts. Under the ENR program, a carcass gets $900, and up to $1,650 for a prepared pelt. The plan pushed this kind of incentive despite there being minimal proof this helps slow the decline of caribou.

This was noted by the board which recommended ENR report on the effectiveness of the program. It also said the department should monitor wolverine populations.

Habitat degradation was another major concern. The board said the governments should establish “legal protection measures” to ensure the sustainability of Sahtì ekwǫ̀ habitat. Until that happens, Mobile Caribou Conservation zones, like the ones for the Bathurst herd, should be implemented.

As part of the protection measures, the board recommends expanding the Tłı̨chǫ Government’s Ekwǫ̀ Nàxoède K’è program (Boots on the Ground) to post-calving and summer ranges to monitor the effects of climate change.

Background information and the board’s full list of recommendations on the Bluenose-East herd can be found at the end of this article.

Kokètì ekwǫ̀ (Bathurst) herd delay

The WRRB was supposed to deliver its decision on the joint management plans for both the Bluenose-East and Bathurst herds. However, the Bathurst decision has been delayed until September since ENR has yet to provide the board with the final report on the herd’s calving ground survey from last year.

The board explains the delay in a letter dated June 7 that was sent to ENR Minister Robert C. McLeod and Tłı̨chǫ Grand Chief George Mackenzie.

“Throughout the proceeding, ENR assured the WRRB that submission of the 2018 Bathurst Caribou Calving Ground Survey Report was imminent. This report will include the most up-to-date monitoring information on the Kokètì ekwǫ̀ herd. Initially, the WRRB was told that the calving ground survey report would be made available in late April 2019. Most recently, the Board was advised that the calving ground survey report would not be available for a few more weeks. In the absence of the calving ground survey report, the Board and its staff do not know to what extent the current rate of decline is due to caribou deaths or shifts… Those analyses are essential for the Board to understand the problems facing the Kokètì ekwǫ̀ herd.”

CKLB reached out to ENR to see what was causing the delays. According to Meagan Wohlberg, spokesperson for the department, the report is going through its final review.

“We regret that the WRRB has had to delay its submission of its final Reasons for Decision Report. That said, the Department feels it is imperative to ensure the final report is comprehensive and accurate prior to being released,” she wrote in an email.

CKLB asked for specific reasons for the department not submitting the report when it said it would.

Wohlberg said other management activities took priority over delivering the report like collaring an additional 66 barren-ground caribou for monitoring and finishing the spring calving surveys.

“Given that all harvest on the Bathurst herd is already closed and unlikely to change as a result of the WRRB process and/or additional demographic data in the survey report, ENR opted to prioritize the Bluenose-East survey report for completion, since decisions on changes to the Total Allowable Harvest had yet to be made for that herd,” she said.

According to Wohlberg, the report will be shared with the WRRB in the next few weeks.

The board has postponed the Kokètì ekwǫ̀ herd proceeding until July 19. If it hasn’t received the report by then, the board says it will consider “compelling ENR officials” to explain the hold up.

BACKGROUNDER_BNE Reasons for Decision Final Report - 18jun19

About the Author

Francis Tessier-Burns
Francis has been a general news reporter with CKLB since January 2019. Originally from rural Ontario, he first came to the NWT in 2016 as an intern with Up Here magazine and fell in love with the North. In his time with CKLB, he's had the immense pleasure and honour of learning about northern Indigenous cultures. Otherwise, you can find him hanging around the Legislative Assembly. If you have a story or want to chat, reach out to francis@cklbradio.com